Big Tech’s Pledge to Pay for AI Grid Expansion is Only a Political Solution
- 4 days ago
- 4 min read
Energy Policy Perspectives Vol. 14 - March 6, 2026
The Trump administration released the Ratepayer Protection Pledge Proclamation on March 4th. The voluntary agreement signed by Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Oracle, OpenAI, and xAI aims to prevent the expansion of AI data centers from increasing residential and small commercial electricity bills. The Pledge “requires” participating companies to cover the full cost of the incremental generation and grid infrastructure for their data centers, even if ultimately unused, and to negotiate separate rate structures rather than utilities socializing a portion of these costs across small customers. Still, it is not always easy to directly identify exactly who benefits from all new infrastructure investments.
The Pledge however, does little to solve the technical or regulatory gaps at the heart of electricity affordability, but it could help shape the political narrative around AI electricity demand and general affordability. The reason the Pledge was not released as an Executive Order (EO) is simple, the Executive Branch lacks any real legal authority to set electricity rates. Ultimately, state utility regulators and state legislatures have the authority to set electricity rates. In fact, contracts between Big Tech and utilities have long utilized the principles of the Pledge. State utility regulators already base their approval processes on the same principles and are already formalizing stricter cost-causation frameworks and large-load tariff classes for AI data centers. Indeed, most contracts and specialized tariffs for Big Tech today include net benefits terms for smaller customer classes. However, public backlash to the construction of data centers has grown due to the oversimplistic narrative that AI is the only reason for rising electricity prices. So, we suspect the Pledge’s true intent is to combat the rising number of states, counties, and municipalities proposing data center moratorium bills born out of affordability concerns.
Utilities could indeed benefit from contractually reduced stranded asset risks, potentially easier regulatory approvals (if they can demonstrate ratepayers are protected), and greater investment clarity while partially addressing one angle of public opposition to approved projects. However, we fear the public could misinterpret “Ratepayer Protection” as “retail rates will not increase at all”, which could lead to greater public scrutiny of rate base growth unrelated to AI data centers (i.e. new electricity generation, wildfire mitigation, storm hardening, transmission expansion, reliability upgrades, etc.). This Pledge could also accelerate bring your own power (“BYOP”) strategies which has some potential to reduce utility earnings growth opportunities and the environmental oversight of Big Tech owned electricity resources. New large hyperscaler electricity loads are already a new class of customer with significant negotiating power and increasing influence over what infrastructure gets built, where and by whom. Utility earnings growth could become increasingly dependent on large private counterparties and long-term bilateral contracts as opposed to the traditional regulated utility financing model backed by American ratepayers.
Ultimately, the multi-decade delays in modernizing U.S. energy infrastructure, often delayed by state regulators to limit annual cost increases to consumers, is beginning to catch up with U.S. electricity affordability as new large load customers have accelerated the need for modernization. We believe the affordability issue will remain beyond the near-term data center/AI compute expansion as the U.S. electrification trend continues.
PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, REG AC ANALYST CERTIFICATION AND DISCLAIMERS
Siebert Williams Shank & Co., LLC or its Affiliates do and seek too business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Analyst Certification
We, Christopher R. Ellinghaus and Gabriele Sorbara hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect our personal views about the subject companies and their securities. We further certify that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be directly, or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views contained in this research report.
Financial Interests: Neither we, Christopher R. Ellinghaus or Gabriele Sorbara, nor any member of our households own securities in any of the subject companies mentioned in this research report. Neither we, nor a member of our households is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the subject company or has another significant affiliation with the subject company. We do not know or have reason to know at the time of this publication of any other material conflict of interest.
Analyst Compensation: The authors compensation is based upon the value attributed to research services by Siebert Williams Shank institutional brokerage clients. The authors of this report are compensated based on the performance of the firm, and have not received any compensation in the past 12 months from any of the subject companies mentioned in this report. The performance of the firm is driven by its secondary trading revenues, investment banking revenues, and asset management revenues.
Siebert Williams Shank Equity Research Ratings Key
BUY: In the analyst's opinion, the stock will outperform the S&P 500 on a total return basis over the next 12 months.
HOLD: In the analyst's opinion, the stock will perform in line with the S&P 500 on a total return basis over the next 12 months.
SELL: In the analyst's opinion, the stock will underperform the S&P 500 on a total return basis over the next 12 months.
Distribution of Equity Research Ratings as of: March 5, 2026
IBC (Investment Banking Clients) is defined as companies in respect of which Siebert Williams Shank (the “firm”) or its affiliates have received or are entitled to receive compensation for investment banking services in connection with transactions that were publicly announced in the past 12 months.
Other Important Disclosures
Investment Banking Disclosures: Within the past 12 months, the research analyst authoring this report has not participated in a solicitation of any subject company mentioned within this report, with or at the request of investment bankers, for investment banking business. Within the past 12 months, the firm and its affiliates have not managed or co-managed a public offering of the securities of any subject company mentioned within this report, nor has the firm received compensation for investment banking products or services from those companies.
Firm Compensation: Within the past 12 months, the firm and its affiliates have not received compensation for any non-investment banking products or services for subject companies mentioned in this report, and none of these subject companies have been a client of the firm during the past 12 months.
Stock Ownership: The firm and its affiliates do not own 1% or more of any class of equity security in this report, and do not make a market in any such securities.
Disclaimers: The information and opinions contained in this report were prepared by the firm and have been derived from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, can be made as to their accuracy. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. This report is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any securities. The firm makes every effort to use valuation methodologies that it believes to be reasonable in the derivation of price targets, but we do not guarantee that such methodologies are accurate.
Additional Information: To receive any additional information upon which this report is based, please contact:
Siebert Williams Shank, Research Department
100 Wall Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10015
212-830-4500
